<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jack in the Box</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidyetty.com/jack-in-the-box/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidyetty.com/jack-in-the-box/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:35:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin hudson</title>
		<link>http://davidyetty.com/jack-in-the-box/comment-page-1/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>justin hudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedarnologist.com/davidyetty/2009/03/jack-in-the-box/#comment-378</guid>
		<description>i hate the word brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hate the word brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alvin</title>
		<link>http://davidyetty.com/jack-in-the-box/comment-page-1/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>Alvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedarnologist.com/davidyetty/2009/03/jack-in-the-box/#comment-377</guid>
		<description>The thing that bugs me about the Jack in the Box &quot;rebrand&quot; is how utterly &lt;i&gt;unnecessary&lt;/i&gt; it was.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It&#039;s understandable to see an opportunity to redesign or update something that was poorly designed to begin with. JiTB in particular just needed a refresh of their look. The logo itself was great -- iconic, easy to recognize and well-designed with quirky nuances that could only be picked up by a few.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;ve been a huge Duffy fan ever since I was a student, but what&#039;s up with that techno-type at the bottom?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing that bugs me about the Jack in the Box &#8220;rebrand&#8221; is how utterly <i>unnecessary</i> it was.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s understandable to see an opportunity to redesign or update something that was poorly designed to begin with. JiTB in particular just needed a refresh of their look. The logo itself was great &#8212; iconic, easy to recognize and well-designed with quirky nuances that could only be picked up by a few.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been a huge Duffy fan ever since I was a student, but what&#8217;s up with that techno-type at the bottom?</p>
<p>Sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

